UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-7893
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
RAYMOND CHERISSON,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief
District Judge. (CR-94-97)
Submitted: February 20, 2003 Decided: February 27, 2003
Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Raymond Cherisson, Appellant Pro Se. Christine Blaise Hamilton,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Raymond Cherisson appeals the district court’s order denying
his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion. We have reviewed the record and
the district court’s opinion and order and find no reversible
error. See Temkin v. Frederick County Comm’r, 945 F.2d 716, 723
(4th Cir. 1991). The claims Cherisson raised in his Rule 60(b)
motion are foreclosed by the mandate rule. United States v. Bell,
5 F.3d 64, 66-67 (4th Cir. 1993). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2