UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-7655
RICHARD JANSEN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
MARYLAND PAROLE COMMISSION; RUTH OGLE, Parole
Hearing Officer; ATTORNEY GENERAL, Joseph
Curran,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CA-
02-791-CCB)
Submitted: April 17, 2003 Decided: April 22, 2003
Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Richard Jansen, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney
General, Baltimore, Maryland; Susan Howe Baron, DEPARTMENT OF
PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Richard Jansen appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. See Jansen v. Maryland
Parole Comm’n, No. CA-02-791-CCB (D. Md. Oct. 15, 2002). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2