UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-6365
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
VARDEN M. GRANDISON, a/k/a Verden M.
Grandison,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., District
Judge. (CR-01-126)
Submitted: April 24, 2003 Decided: May 5, 2003
Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Varden M. Grandison, Appellant Pro Se. Eric J. McDonald, OFFICE OF
THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Varden M. Grandison appeals the district court’s order denying
his February 2003 motion for reconsideration of a sentence imposed
in March 2002.* We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. See United States v. Grandison, No. CR-01-126
(E.D. Va. Feb. 18, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
*
To the extent Grandison’s informal brief raises additional
claims not directly related to the denial of his motion for
reconsideration, this court is without jurisdiction to consider
them. See Browder v. Director, Dep’t of Corr., 434 U.S. 257, 264
(1978) (holding that period for filing notice of appal is
“mandatory and jurisdictional”).
2