UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-4068
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
TIMOTHY JOHN PULLIAM,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Durham. N. Calton Tilley, Jr., Chief
District Judge. (CR-02-134)
Submitted: May 15, 2003 Decided: May 22, 2003
Before LUTTIG and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Louis C. Allen, III, Federal Public Defender, William C. Ingram,
Assistant Federal Public Defender, Greensboro, North Carolina, for
Appellant. Anna Mills Wagoner, United States Attorney, Lisa B.
Boggs, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North
Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Timothy John Pulliam pled guilty to one count of possession of
a firearm after having been convicted of a crime punishable by more
than one year imprisonment, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g),
924(e) (2000). The district court determined that Pulliam qualified
as an armed career criminal under 18 U.S.C. § 924(e) (2000), and
sentenced him to a total of 182 months imprisonment. He appeals his
sentence.
Pulliam asserts that because the predicate convictions under
§ 924(e) were not alleged in the indictment, the enhanced offense
level used to calculate his sentence violates the rule announced in
Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000). We have previously
rejected a similar argument, and conclude that Pulliam’s assertion
of error is without merit. United States v. Sterling, 283 F.3d 216,
219-20 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 536 U.S. 931 (2002).
Accordingly, we affirm Pulliam’s conviction and sentence. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2