UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-7366
MICHAEL W. SLOAN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
JANE KIMBRIEL; JAMES M. LESLIE,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, i.e., U.S.
Attorney's Office; FEDERAL BUREAU OF
INVESTIGATION,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District
Judge. (CA-01-347-3)
Submitted: May 8, 2003 Decided: May 21, 2003
Before WIDENER and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael W. Sloan, Appellant Pro Se. Pamela Anne Sargent, Assistant
Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Michael W. Sloan appeals the district court’s orders accepting
the recommendation of the magistrate judge, denying relief on his
mandamus petition, granting judgment to the Defendants on his 42
U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint, and denying his motion for
reconsideration under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. See Sloan v. United
States, No. CA-01-347-3 (E.D. Va. Mar. 5, 2002; July 10, 2002; Aug.
14, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2