UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-2341
BERNARD DUNCAN, Reverend,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS, Mecklenburg Correctional Center,
Defendant - Appellee.
No. 02-2454
BERNARD DUNCAN, Reverend,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS, Mecklenburg Correctional Center,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge.
(CA-02-616-3)
Submitted: April 18, 2003 Decided: May 19, 2003
Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Bernard Duncan, Appellant Pro Se. Margaret Alice Browne,
UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
2
PER CURIAM:
Bernard Duncan appeals the district court’s orders dismissing
his discrimination action and denying his motion for judicial
recusal. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See
Duncan v. Virginia, No. CA-02-616-3 (E.D. Va. Oct. 4 & Dec. 12,
2002).
Duncan also seeks to appeal this Court’s May 25, 2001, opinion
affirming the district court’s dismissal of his previous
discrimination action. Duncan v. Commonwealth of Virginia, No. 00-
2551, 9 Fed. Appx. 236, 2001 WL 565672 (4th Cir. May 25, 2001)
(unpublished). We have previously denied both Duncan’s rehearing
petition as to this decision and his motion for reconsideration of
the denial of his rehearing petition. No further “appeal” to this
Court is available.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3