UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-1950
DAISY EDMUNDSON-SULLIVAN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
VELOCITY EXPRESS-MID ATLANTIC, INCORPORATED,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
DEBI BRENNER; MIKE KOSTNERS; CAROLINA KERNS,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, District
Judge. (CA-01-802)
Submitted: March 21, 2003 Decided: June 4, 2003
Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Daisy Edmundson-Sullivan, Appellant Pro Se. Dana Trena Buckman,
MCGUIREWOODS, L.L.P., McLean, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Daisy Edmundson-Sullivan appeals from the orders of the
district court dismissing her claims alleging discrimination and
retaliation in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of
1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e - 2000e-17 (2000). Edmundson-Sullivan
raises several claims of error regarding matters that either were
not raised in the district court or involve defendants that are not
parties to the case on appeal. Matters raised for the first time on
appeal generally will not be considered. See Muth v. United States,
1 F.3d 246, 250 (4th Cir. 1993). Exceptions to this rule are made
only in those limited circumstances that would result in
unrecognized plain error or a fundamental miscarriage of justice.
Id. Neither of these factors is present in Edmundson-Sullivan’s
claims. Because Edmundson-Sullivan presents no other cognizable
claims for review, we affirm the judgment of the district court.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2