Griffin v. Commonwealth of VA

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-6144 MATTHEW JAMES GRIFFIN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA; GENE M. JOHNSON, in his Official capacity as Deputy Director of the VDOC; STAN YOUNG, individually and in his capacity as Warden of the Wallens Ridge State Prison; MR. COUNTS, individually and in his official capacity as Sergeant of the Wallens Ridge State Prison; MR. HAMILTON, individually and in his official capacity as a Sergeant of the Wallens Ridge State Prison; MR. YATES, individually and in his official capacity as a Major of the Wallens Ridge State Prison, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District Judge. (CA-02-930-7) Submitted: June 26, 2003 Decided: July 9, 2003 Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Matthew James Griffin, Appellant Pro Se. Philip Carlton Hollowell, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Matthew James Griffin appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially* on the reasoning of the district court. See Griffin v. Virginia, No. CA-02-930-7 (W.D. Va. Dec. 17, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED * We affirm Griffin’s challenges to the district court’s dismissal of his claim that prison officials opened his incoming legal mail outside of his presence on the ground that the prison’s emergency mailroom procedure was reasonably related to legitimate penological interests. See Turner v. Safley, 482 U.S. 78, 79 (1987). 2