UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-1764
GLENDORA,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
DENNIS JACOBS; JOHN M. WALKER, JR.; ROSEANN B.
MACKECHNE; BERNARD F. MADSEN, JR.; RALPH
GARGULIO, Physician’s Assistant; SUBHASH
KULKARNI; HUDSON VALLEY EMERGENCY PHYSICIAN;
LEROY PHILLIPS; ASHOK SHAH; ASGHAR ANWAR;
HUDSON VALLEY CRITICAL CARE PHYSICIANS, PC;
DIANE KANTAROS; JAMES SCADUTO; DANIEL CAPURRI;
DANIEL M. PHILBIN; LAWRENCE S. SCHEK; KHURRZM
I. ASHRAF; TACONIC CARDIOTHORACIC SURGEONS;
PETER ZAKOW; HUDSON VALLEY UROLOGY; HUDSON
VALLEY RADIOLOGY PC; BRYAN YEN; DONALD LIEN;
MARK R. BRADY; BENJAMIN SECKLER; PHILIP
AMATULLE; HENRY J. FISCHER, JR.; JOSEPH
ANTONIO; JACK I. HENTZEL; GOLDSTEIN W. ZEV;
VASSAR BROTHERS MEDICAL CENTER; NCO FINANCIAL
SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED, f/k/a The Revenue
Maximization Group, Incorporated; DANIEL P.
SICCONE; PAUL LAPLANTE; REGGIE ANDERSON;
DIANNE BENNETT; CHARLES F. DOLAN; JAMES L.
DOLAN; MACK BUDILL; THOMAS GARGER; CHARLES A.
FORMZ; CABLEVISION SYSTEMS CORPORATION; ROBERT
CALLAWAY; SATTERLEE, STEPHENS, BURKE & BURKE;
DEZNELL REECE TACHZ; PAUL J. KELLY, JR.;
JUDICIAL COUNCIL; HARRIS I. HARTZ; PATRICK
FISCHER; AUDREY WEIGEL; HUG; O’SCANLAIN;
TASHIMA; CATHY CATTERSON; JEFF CROCKER; ROBERT
W. DOYLE; ROBERT A. LIFSON; KENNETH W.
RUDOLPH; NANCY SUNSHINE; WILLIAM W. WILKINS;
BOYCE F. MARTIN; LAURI BZTTANANI; JAMES O.
ROBBINS; COX COMMUNICATIONS, INCORPORATED;
CAROL B. AMON; J. L. EDMONDSON; ROBERT E.
GERBER; SHELLEY C. CHAPMAN; KAREN MURPHY,
Defendants - Appellees.
2
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-03-
1166-MJG)
Submitted: August 14, 2003 Decided: August 20, 2003
Before WILLIAMS, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Glendora, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
3
PER CURIAM:
Glendora appeals the district court’s order denying relief on
her civil rights complaint. We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. See Glendora v. Jacobs, No. CA-03-1166-MJG
(D. Md. Apr. 30, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
4