UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-6990
In Re: RANDY REYNOLDS,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CR-98-8)
Submitted: August 28, 2003 Decided: September 10, 2003
Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Randy Reynolds, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Randy Reynolds petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the
district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255
(2000) motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the
district court to act. We find there has been no undue delay in the
district court. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in
forma pauperis, we deny the petition for a writ of mandamus. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
2