Filed: December 3, 2003
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-1633
(CA-99-664-1, CA-00-166-1)
Diane Joy Jenkins,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
The Trustees of Sandhills Community College,
et al.,
Defendats - Appellees.
O R D E R
The court amends its opinion filed November 10, 2003, as
follows:
On the cover sheet, section 3, line 2 -- the district court is
corrected from “Durham” to “Greensboro.”
For the Court - By Direction
/s/ Patricia S. Connor
Clerk
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-1633
DIANE JOY JENKINS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
THE TRUSTEES OF SANDHILLS COMMUNITY COLLEGE;
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
JOHN DEMPSEY, JR., individually and as an
employee; CAROL EWING, individually and as an
employee; JAMES HALSTEAD, individually and as
an employee; MARY ANN WARD, individually and
as an employee; TERESA WOOD, individually and
as an employee; GEORGE LEWIS, individually and
as an employee; RICHARD LEWIS, individually
and as an employee; SUSANNE ADAMS,
individually and as an employee,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr.,
Chief District Judge. (CA-99-664-1, CA-00-166-1)
Submitted: October 22, 2003 Decided: November 10, 2003
Before WILKINSON, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Diane Joy Jenkins, Appellant Pro Se. Randall Maitland Roden,
THARRINGTON, SMITH, L.L.P., Raleigh, North Carolina; Steven Price
Weaver, TUGGLE, DUGGINS & MESCHAN, P.A., Greensboro, North
Carolina; Joyce S. Rutledge, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF
NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Diane Joy Jenkins appeals the district court’s order granting
summary judgment in part and dismissing in part her employment
discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. See Jenkins v. Trustees of Sandhills Comm.
College, Nos. CA-99-664-1; CA-00-166-1 (M.D.N.C. Apr. 25, 2003).
We deny Jenkins’ motion for a change of venue. We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3