Jones v. Maryland Dept Cor

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-7445 CHARLES WARNER JONES, a/k/a Charles Jones, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS COMMISSIONERS; SERGEANT MCDONALD; CO II SELLMAN; CO II SOFELLO; CO IV PAINTER; JAMES PEGUESE, Each Defendant is hereby sued individually and severally, Defendants - Appellees, and SECURITY OFFICER STITCH, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (CA- 03-412-RDB) Submitted: November 19, 2003 Decided: December 8, 2003 Before WILKINSON and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Charles Jones, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Stephanie Judith Lane-Weber, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Charles Jones appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Jones v. Maryland Dep’t of Corr. Comm’rs, No. CA-03-412-RDB (D. Md. Aug. 26, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2