IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
__________________
No. 95-40839
Conference Calendar
__________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
B. A. WILCOXSON, III,
Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:95-CR-9
- - - - - - - - - -
August 20, 1996
Before KING, DUHÉ, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
B. A. Wilcoxson, III, appeals his sentence in a guilty-plea
conviction for possession of counterfeited securities in
violation of 18 U.S.C. § 513. He argues that the district court
erred in considering the dismissed charges as relevant conduct
for sentencing purposes and finding that the offense conduct
involved more than minimal planning. We have reviewed the record
and the briefs of the parties and hold that the findings of the
*
Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule
47.5.4.
No. 95-40839
-2-
district court are not clearly erroneous. See United States v.
Vital, 68 F.3d 114, 117-18 (5th Cir. 1995); United States v.
Clements, 73 F.3d 1330, 1340-41 (5th Cir. 1996).
AFFIRMED.