UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-4085
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
GARY ANDRE WATSON,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CR-
02-77-DKC)
Submitted: December 18, 2003 Decided: January 15, 2004
Before LUTTIG, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William W. Kanwisher, LAW OFFICES OF WILLIAM W. KANWISHER,
Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellant. Barbara Suzanne Skalla,
Assistant United States Attorney, Daphene Rose McFerren, OFFICE OF
THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Gary Andre Watson seeks to appeal his conviction,
pursuant to a written plea agreement, and 121-month sentence for
distributing less than five grams of cocaine base. The Government
has moved to dismiss the appeal as waived.* The plea agreement
specifically included a waiver of Watson’s right to appeal his
sentence. A waiver of appeal provision in a valid plea agreement
is enforceable if it resulted from a knowing and intelligent
decision to forgo an appeal. United States v. Attar, 38 F.3d 727,
731 (4th Cir. 1994); United States v. Wiggins, 905 F.2d 51, 53 (4th
Cir. 1990). This court reviews de novo the validity of a waiver.
United States v. Brown, 232 F.3d 399, 402-03 (4th Cir. 2000). We
conclude that Watson knowingly agreed to the waiver. Therefore, we
grant the Government’s motion to dismiss the appeal. We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
*
Counsel for Watson initially responded by conceding the merit
of the Government’s position. The court ordered counsel to verify
that Watson agreed to drop his appeal. See 4th Cir. R. 42. Watson
did not consent to the dismissal, and counsel filed a brief
pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).
- 2 -