UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-7682
CLINTON R. BEDELL, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
VT. D.O.C.; JOHN GORCZYK; J. LABRIOLA; DR.
CURRY-EL, Psychologist; DR. GENERAL; DR.
FIELDING; B. BLAKELY; E. WILLIAMS; F. ROACH;
C. MITCHELL; C. DAVIS; M. MILLARD; M. BOONE;
K. DAVIS,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
RON ANGELONE, F.T.C.A. Official Capacity;
INTERSTATE COMPACT CONTRACT; GREENSVILLE; VA.
D.O.C.; K. CLARK; TERRY MOSHER, (VtDoc);
SHAUNA LEWIS; DR. LEWIS; R. SPENCE; G.
GARRAGHTY,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District
Judge. (CA-01-780-2)
Submitted: December 19, 2003 Decided: February 11, 2004
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Clinton R. Bedell, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Philip Carlton
Hollowell, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond,
Virginia; John David McChesney, RAWLS & MCNELIS, P.C., Richmond,
Virginia; Michael Eugene Ornoff, ORNOFF & ARNOLD, P.C., Virginia
Beach, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Clinton R. Bedell, Jr., appeals the district court’s
judgment dismissing his complaint against various defendants,
including prison authorities in Virginia and Vermont. We have
reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and orders
disposing of Bedell’s claims and find no error. Accordingly, we
affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Bedell v.
Vermont Dep’t of Corr., No. CA-01-780-2 (E.D. Va. Oct. 6, 2003).
We deny Bedell’s motion for leave to file a supplemental brief and
we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 3 -