UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-2009
MESERT HAILU BEDASSO,
Petitioner,
versus
JOHN D. ASHCROFT, United States Attorney
General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals. (A75-381-424)
Submitted: March 10, 2004 Decided: March 26, 2004
Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Joe W. Nesari, LAW OFFICE OF J.W. NESARI, L.L.C., Herndon,
Virginia, for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney
General, David V. Bernal, Assistant Director, Colette J. Winston,
OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION LITIGATION, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Mesert Hailu Bedasso, a native and citizen of Ethiopia,
petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals (“Board”) denying her motion to reopen immigration
proceedings. We have reviewed the record and the Board’s order and
find that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying
Bedasso’s motion to reopen. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2003);
INS v. Doherty, 502 U.S. 314, 323-24 (1992). Accordingly, we deny
the petition for review on the reasoning of the Board. See In re:
Hailu, No. A75-381-424 (B.I.A. July 31, 2003). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
- 2 -