Harris v. Commissioner

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-2102 CALLIE A. HARRIS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Big Stone Gap. James P. Jones, District Judge. (CA-02-72-2) Submitted: February 27, 2004 Decided: April 6, 2004 Before MOTZ, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Joseph E. Wolfe, WOLFE, WILLIAMS & RUTHERFORD, Norton, Virginia, for Appellant. James A. Winn, Regional Chief Counsel, Stephen T. Giacchino, Assistant Regional Counsel, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; John L. Brownlee, United States Attorney, Julie C. Dudley, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Callie A. Harris appeals the district court’s order affirming the Commissioner’s denial of social security supplemental security income benefits. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. We must uphold the Commissioner’s disability determination if it is supported by substantial evidence. 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (2000); Hays v. Sullivan, 907 F.2d 1453, 1456 (4th Cir. 1990). Having thoroughly reviewed the administrative record, we agree with the district court that substantial evidence supports the Commissioner’s final decision denying disability benefits. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Harris v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec., No. CA-02-72-2 (W.D. Va. July 28, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -