Jackson v. Parrish

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-6470 EDDIE THOMAS JACKSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus RUSTY PARRISH, each in his personal and official capacity; WILLIAM C. SIMMON, Sheriff, each in his personal and official capacity, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. C. Weston Houck, Senior District Judge. (CA-02-1756-8-12) Submitted: April 23, 2004 Decided: May 14, 2004 Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Eddie Thomas Jackson, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Foster McLeod, HARRIS & MCLEOD, Cheraw, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Eddie Thomas Jackson appeals the district court’s order accepting in part the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Jackson v. Parrish, No. CA-02-1756-8-12 (D.S.C. Mar. 9, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -