UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-1103
ANDREA G. BRIGGS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
CATHERINE C. BLAKE; J. FREDERICK MOTZ; WALTER
E. BLACK, JR.; DEBORAH K. CHASANOW; ANDRE M.
DAVIS; MARVIN J. GARBIS; ALEXANDER H. HARVEY,
II; BENSON E. LEGG; PETER J. MESSITTE; WILLIAM
M. NICKERSON; EDWARD S. NORTHROP; FREDERIC N.
SMALKIN; ALEXANDER WILLIAMS, JR.; JOSEPH H.
YOUNG; JOHN DOE; H. EMORY WIDENER, JR.; J.
HARVIE WILKINSON, III; PAUL V. NIEMEYER; J.
MICHAEL LUTTIG; KAREN J. WILLIAMS; M. BLANE
MICHAEL; DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ; WILLIAM B.
TRAXLER, JR.; ROBERT B. KING; ROBERT L.
GREGORY; DENNIS L. GREGORY; DENNIS W. SHEDD;
ALLYSON K. DUNCAN; JOHN D. BUTZNER, JR.; J.
DICKSON PHILLIPS, JR.; ROBERT F. CHAPMAN;
CLYDE H. HAMILTON; JANE DOE; PATRICIA S.
CONNOR,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge.
(CA-03-3130-WDQ-1)
Submitted: May 19, 2004 Decided: June 15, 2004
Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Andrea G. Briggs, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Andrea G. Briggs appeals the district court’s order
dismissing as frivolous her civil action. Our review of the record
and the district court’s opinion discloses no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See Briggs v. Blake, No. CA-03-3130-WDQ-1 (D. Md. Nov. 14,
2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 3 -