UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-6480
CLEVELAND SANDERS,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Greenville. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge.
(CA-03-1127-6-25AK)
Submitted: July 15, 2004 Decided: July 21, 2004
Before MOTZ, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Cleveland Sanders, Appellant Pro Se. Susan Rawls Edwards, NEXSEN
PRUETT, Columbia, South Carolina; Roy F. Laney, RILEY, POPE &
LANEY, LLC, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Cleveland Sanders appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge to deny his
motion to remand his action back to state court. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on
the reasoning of the district court. See Sanders v. South Carolina
Dep’t of Corr., No. CA-03-1127-6-25AK (D.S.C. Feb. 12, 2004). We
deny Sanders’s motion to consolidate, and we dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -