PER CURIAM:
Lori D. Blakely appeals the district court’s orders denying her motion to compel the Government to file a motion under Fed.R.Crim.P. 35(b) and motion to reconsider. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the dis *791 trict court. See United States v. Blakely, Nos. CR-97-678 (D.S.C. May 25, 2004; Feb. 12, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED