PER CURIAM.
Richard Enriquez appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his motion to clarify the court’s intention as to the concurrent nature of his sentence. * We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Enriquez, No. CR-97-173-MU (W.D.N.C. Nov. 6, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
*
Contrary to the government’s assertion, Enri-quez timely filed his notice of appeal. See Fed. R.App. P. 4(b)(1)(A), 26(a)(2).