IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
__________________
No. 95-50835
Summary Calendar
__________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
GREG HALL,
Defendant-Appellee.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. MO-95-CR-21-1
- - - - - - - - - -
July 31, 1996
Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Greg Hall appeals his conviction of distribution of cocaine
base. He contends solely that his guilty plea is invalid because
the district court violated Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(c)(1). The
district court's error in advising Hall that he faced four years
of supervised release when he really faced five was harmless
error inasmuch as the sentence of which he was warned was
substantially greater than that which he received. See United
*
Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule
47.5.4.
No. 95-50835
-2-
States v. Pierce, 5 F.3d 791, 793-94 (5th Cir. 1993). Likewise,
the district court's failure to advise Hall of all the
consequences of violating his term of supervised release cannot
be considered a material factor which affected his decision to
plead guilty. See United States v. Johnson, 1 F.3d 296, 302 (5th
Cir. 1993) (en banc).
AFFIRMED.