UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-1138
JAMES KING; LINDA KING; WENDY KING,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
and
STANLEY JAMES DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION,
Plaintiff,
versus
LAW FIRM OF GOLDMAN & VETTER; BIG CREEK
ENTERPRISES, INCORPORATED, an Illinois
Corporation and James Elson; MIDAMERICA
NATIONAL BANK, and Mr. David Hayes; IRVING
EVANS; GARNET EVANS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-02-
2164-AMD)
Submitted: July 10, 2003 Decided: October 6, 2004
Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William Ray Ford, Camp Springs, Maryland, for Appellants. Gerard
R. Vetter, GOLDMAN & VETTER, P.A., Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellee Law Firm of Goldman & Vetter; Irving Evans, Garnet Evans,
Appellees Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
James King, Linda King, and Wendy King appeal the
district court’s order dismissing sua sponte their civil complaint
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) (2000). We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the
reasoning of the district court. See King v. Law Firm of Goldman
& Vetter, No. CA-02-2164-AMD (D. Md. Jan. 13, 2003). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 3 -
King v. Law Firm of Goldman & Vetter
Combined Opinion