UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-6210
DANIEL L. STALEY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
DOE RIDER, Mental Health Counselor at Kirkland
Correctional Institution R&E Center;
UNIDENTIFIED INDIVIDUALS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Beaufort. Patrick Michael Duffy, District
Judge. (CA-03-3489-23BG-9)
Submitted: June 16, 2004 Decided: November 15, 2004
Before WILKINSON and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Daniel L. Staley, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Daniel L. Staley appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action for failure to comply
with an order of the magistrate judge. Staley contends in his
informal brief that he did not receive that order, and that an
examination of the prison mail logs will support his contention.
We decline to remand the case for a determination of whether Staley
did or did not receive the order in question. We conclude that,
even if Staley did not receive the order, his complaint is subject
to summary dismissal as it fails to state a claim on which relief
may be granted. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). Accordingly, we
affirm the order of the district court dismissing the complaint
without prejudice.* We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
*
Though a dismissal without prejudice is ordinarily not a
final, appealable order, see Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers
Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993), the
applicable three-year statute of limitations period appears to have
passed in this case. See S.C. Code Ann. § 15-3-530(5) (Law. Co-op.
Cum. Supp. 2003). Thus, the order is effectively a final order.
- 2 -