IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
_____________________
No. 95-50880
Summary Calendar
_____________________
RIAD E. HAMAD,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
H E B FOOD STORES,
Defendant-Appellee.
_________________________________________________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Western District of Texas
USDC No. A-94-CV-649
_________________________________________________________________
August 1, 1996
Before JOLLY, JONES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Riad E. Hamad, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, appeals the
district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of H.E.B. Food
Stores ("HEB"), dismissing Hamad's claims under Title VII of the
Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., and the Age
discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq.. Hamad
*
Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.
contends that HEB failed to promote him to its store management and
distribution management trainee programs because of Hamad's race,
national origin, and age. Hamad also contends that HEB terminated
him prematurely in retaliation for his intention to complain about
the discriminatory treatment.
After conducting a de novo review of the record and the
parties' briefs, we perceive no reversible error in the district
court's decision. See Bodenheimer v. PPG Indus., 5 F.3d 955, 956
(5th Cir. 1993). Accordingly, we AFFIRM for essentially the
reasons adopted by the district court. Hamad v. H E B Food Stores,
No. A-94-CV-649 (W.D. Tex. Nov. 7, 1995).
A F F I R M E D.
-2-