UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-2409
LIA MAYNILDA; HERRY JAYA LIENARDY LIE,
Petitioners,
versus
ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals. (A79-466-302; A79-466-303)
Submitted: March 30, 2005 Decided: April 7, 2005
Before WILKINSON and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lia Maynilda, Herry Jaya Lienardy Lie, Petitioners Pro Se. M.
Jocelyn Lopez Wright, Song E. Park, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF
JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Lia Maynilda and Herry Jaya Lienardy Lie, natives and
citizens of Indonesia, petition for review of two separate orders
of the Board of Immigration Appeals affirming the immigration
judge’s denial of their requests for asylum and withholding of
removal. To obtain reversal of a determination denying eligibility
for relief, an alien “must show that the evidence he presented was
so compelling that no reasonable factfinder could fail to find the
requisite fear of persecution.” INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S.
478, 483-84 (1992). We have reviewed the evidence of record and
conclude that the Petitioners fail to show that the evidence
compels a contrary result. Having failed to qualify for asylum,
the Petitioners cannot meet the higher standard to qualify for
withholding of removal. Camara v. Ashcroft, 378 F.3d 361, 367 (4th
Cir. 2004).
Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
- 2 -