UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-2306
LENIR RICHARDSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
ROSYLN CHILDREN CENTER; BRAZILIAN CONSULATE;
LEAH CAKE SOUTHERLIN, Probation Officer;
BEVERLY RUSSELL, Dr.; FAIRFAX COUNTY ADULT
DETENTION CENTER; URSULA KOENIG; ELLEN ZEHL,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
REX PAGERIE, Officer; KATRENE ENGLAND,
Officer,
Defendants.
No. 04-2568
LENIR RICHARDSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
ROSYLN CHILDREN CENTER; REX PAGERIE, Officer;
KATRENE ENGLAND, Officer; BRAZILIAN CONSULATE;
LEAH CAKE SOUTHERLIN, Probation Officer;
BEVERLY RUSSELL, Dr.; FAIRFAX COUNTY ADULT
DETENTION CENTER; URSULA KOENIG; ELLEN ZEHL,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District
Judge. (CA-04-867)
Submitted: March 25, 2005 Decided: April 13, 2005
Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
No. 04-2306 dismissed; No. 04-2568 affirmed by unpublished per
curiam opinion.
Lenir Richardson, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Marvel Ross, COUNTY
ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
In these consolidated appeals, Lenir Richardson appeals
a district court order dismissing as frivolous some of her claims
and some of the defendants under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000)
and a district court order dismissing the remainder of her
complaint as barred by the statute of limitations. In No. 04-2306,
we review the district court’s dismissal de novo. We have reviewed
the record and find the district court properly dismissed some
claims and some defendants as frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss
this appeal as frivolous. In No. 04-2568, we have reviewed the
record and the district court’s order and affirm on the reasoning
of the district court. See Richardson v. Roslyn Children Center,
No. CA-04-867 (E.D. Va. filed Nov. 17, 2004; entered Nov. 19,
2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
No. 04-2306 DISMISSED
No. 04-2568 AFFIRMED
- 3 -