Adkins v. Gainey

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-6654 MICHAEL ANTHONY ADKINS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MRS. GAINEY, R.N.; MS. STAPPS, R.N.; JAMES E. DOOLEY, Sheriff, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District Judge. (CA-05-200-7) Submitted: June 23, 2005 Decided: July 1, 2005 Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael Anthony Adkins, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Michael Anthony Adkins appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny his motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Adkins v. Gainey, No. CA-05-200-7 (W.D. Va. Apr. 8, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -