Jack v. Moore

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-1213 TODD M. JACK, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus BECKY MOORE, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, District Judge. (CA-05-4) Submitted: June 10, 2005 Decided: July 6, 2005 Before NIEMEYER and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Todd M. Jack, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Cameron O’Brion, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Todd Michael Jack appeals the district court’s order dismissing this action under the Rooker-Feldman doctrine* and the doctrine of judicial immunity. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Jack v. Moore, No. CA-05-4 (E.D. Va. filed Feb. 22, 2005; entered Feb. 24, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED * See District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman, 460 U.S. 462 (1983); Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co., 263 U.S. 413 (1923). - 2 -