United States v. Cleveland

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-6662 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus TROY V. CLEVELAND, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, District Judge. (CR-93-402; CA-99-1030) Submitted: September 30, 2005 Decided: October 18, 2005 Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Troy V. Cleveland, Appellant Pro Se. James L. Trump, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Troy V. Cleveland appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his motion construed as a request for reconsideration pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b).* We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Cleveland, Nos. CR-93-402; CA-99-1030 (E.D. Va. Apr. 7, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED * The motion was styled “‘Ends of Justice’ Motion Pursuant to the All Writs Act Under 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a)” and “request[ed] reconsideration” of the denial of a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. - 2 -