Curry v. Wackenhut Corr

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT __________________ No. 96-10007 Summary Calendar __________________ DONNY JOE CURRY, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus WACKENHUT CORRECTIONAL CORPORATION, Administrators (Private Shareholders), ET AL., Defendants, WACKENHUT CORRECTIONAL CORPORATION, Administrators (Private Shareholders), Defendant-Appellee. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:95-CV-553-A - - - - - - - - - - July 22, 1996 Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Donny Joe Curry, #596939, appeals the judgment of the district court dismissing his civil rights action pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). He argues that he was forced 1) to work without pay for a private corporation, managing the prison * Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. No. 96-10007 -2- for profit, in violation of the Thirteenth Amendment 2) to attend a substance abuse program against his will. We have reviewed the record and Curry's brief and conclude that there is no error. Curry v. Wackenhut Correctional Corp., No. 4:95-CV-553-A (N.D. Tex. Dec. 14, 1995). The appeal is without arguable merit and thus frivolous. See Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983; 5th Cir. R. 42.2. We caution Curry that any additional frivolous appeals filed by him or on his behalf will invite the imposition of sanctions. To avoid sanctions, Curry is further cautioned to review all pending appeals to ensure that they do not raise arguments that are frivolous because they have been previously decided by this court. APPEAL DISMISSED. SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.