UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-1597
JOY KISSAM, Administrator of the Estate of
Damon Kissam,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
RAPPAHANNOCK REGIONAL JAIL; LARRY K. HAMILTON,
Superintendent, Rappahannock Regional Jail;
RAPPAHANNOCK REGIONAL JAIL AUTHORITY; CHARLES
JETT, Stafford County, Chairman, Rappahannock
Regional Jail Authority; CHRISTOPHER FRANZEN,
Rappahannock Regional Jail Correctional
Officer; CERTAIN UNNAMED RAPPAHANNOCK REGIONAL
JAIL CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS; CREATIVE HEALTH
RESOURCES, INCORPORATED; ANDREW REESE; PETER
OBER; LEILA CLAPPERTON; REBECKA GRIFFITH; ERIN
PITTMAN; RICHARD AGPAOA, Rappahannock Regional
Jail Correctional Officer; KRISTOPHER
ALBRIGHT, Rappahannock Regional Jail
Correctional Officer; DEANGELIS, Rappahannock
Regional Jail Corporal; DEBORAH SHEPHERD,
Rappahannock Regional Jail Corporal; MACKIE,
Rappahannock Regional Jail Mental Health
Provider; MARY POWELL, Rappahannock Regional
Jail Substance Abuse Counselor,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
DRYDEN, Physicians Assistant; ROBERT A.
DRYDEN,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District
Judge. (CA-04-466-1)
Submitted: January 5, 2006 Decided: January 26, 2006
Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Steven M. Garver, Deborah E. Mayer, GARVER LAW OFFICES, P.C.,
Reston, Virginia, for Appellant. John A. Gibney, Jr., THOMPSON &
McMULLAN, P.C., Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
2
PER CURIAM:
Damon Kissam died while an inmate in the Rappahannock Regional
Jail. Joy Kissam, as administrator of Damon’s estate, sued various
defendants, alleging constitutional claims under 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983
as well as state law claims. The district court granted summary
judgment in favor of the defendants, and Kissam appeals. We have
reviewed the record and the briefs and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order granting summary
judgment against Kissam’s claims. See Kissam v. Rappahannock
Regional Jail, No. 1:04CV466 (E.D. Va. April 20, 2005). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3