UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-7268
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
WAYNE PORTER,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Richard L. Voorhees,
Chief District Judge. (CR-85-62; CA-05-306)
Submitted: January 19, 2006 Decided: January 25, 2006
Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Wayne Porter, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Wayne Porter, who was convicted in 1985 of conducting a
continuing criminal enterprise, appeals the denial of his motion
under former Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(a). Porter asserts that his
conviction violated the Double Jeopardy Clause. However, Rule
35(a) is limited to claims that a sentence itself is illegal and
may not be used to further a claim that the conviction underlying
a sentence is invalid. United States v. Little, 392 F.3d 671, 678
(4th Cir. 2004) (rejecting attempt to challenge conviction on
double jeopardy grounds under former Rule 35(a)). In addition,
Porter’s double jeopardy claim was rejected in his initial 28
U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. Accordingly, we affirm the order of
the district court. We dispense with oral argument, because the
fact and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -