Valdez v. Federal Bureau of Prisons

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-7495 JUAN VALDEZ, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS; HARRELL WATTS; HARLEY G. LAPPIN; BOBBY SHEARIN; MICHAEL R. MUIR; JEFFREY BANEY; JOHN SHOCKEY, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA- 04-2225-DKC) Submitted: February 23, 2006 Decided: March 2, 2006 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Juan Valdez, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Michael DiBiagio, United States Attorney, James A. Frederick, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Juan Valdez appeals the district court’s order denying his Bivens* action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Valdez v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, No. CA- 04-2225-DKC (D. Md. Aug. 4, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED * Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). - 2 -