UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-1978
VINCENT PITTS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
EDO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, INCORPORATED, t/a
Aera,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District
Judge. (CA-05-215-1)
Submitted: April 7, 2006 Decided: May 11, 2006
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Vincent Pitts, Appellant Pro Se. Christopher E. Hassell, BONNER,
KIERNAN, TREBACH & CROCIATA, L.L.P., Washington, D.C., for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Vincent Pitts appeals the district court’s order granting
summary judgment in favor of his former employer in his employment
discrimination action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of
1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2000). We have
reviewed the record and the submissions of the parties and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the
district court. See Pitts v. EDO Prof’l Servs., Inc., No. CA-05-
215-1 (E.D. Va. Aug. 8, 2005). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -