UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-6400
In Re: DANIEL ARTHUR DUNCAN,
Petitioner.
On Petition for a Writ of Mandamus
(3:04-cr-00304-HEH; 3:05-cv-00369-HEH)
Submitted: May 16, 2006 Decided: May 24, 2006
Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Daniel Arthur Duncan, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Daniel Arthur Duncan petitions for a writ of mandamus,
alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28
U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. He seeks an order from this court
directing the district court to act. Our review of the docket
sheet reveals that on March 16, 2006, the district court dismissed
claims one, two and four of Duncan’s § 2255 motion, but referred
claim three to the magistrate judge for further proceedings. We
find that the case is proceeding apace, and there has been no undue
delay. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma
pauperis, we deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
- 2 -