Haranzo v. Virginia Department of Rehabilitative Services

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-2351 JOSEPH T. HARANZO, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF REHABILITATIVE SERVICES, Defendant - Appellee, and COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (CA-05-326-7) Submitted: April 28, 2006 Decided: May 23, 2006 Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG,* and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. * Judge Luttig was a member of the original panel but did not participate in this decision. This opinion is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(d). Joseph T. Haranzo, Appellant Pro Se. Ishneila G. Moore, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). - 2 - PER CURIAM: Joseph T. Haranzo appeals the district court’s order granting the Defendant’s motion to dismiss in this civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Haranzo v. Virginia Dep’t of Rehabilitative Servs., No. CA-05-326-7 (W.D. Va. Nov. 15, 2005). In addition, we deny Haranzo’s request for a trial. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 3 -