UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-2347
MIN BAHADUR THAPA; SHIV KUMARI PAIJA; RAMESH
THAPA,
Petitioners,
versus
ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals. (A95-886-496; A95-886-497; A95-886-498)
Submitted: May 31, 2006 Decided: June 14, 2006
Before TRAXLER, SHEDD, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Khagendra Gharti-Chhetry, CHHETRY & ASSOCIATES, P.C., New York, New
York, for Petitioners. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney
General, M. Jocelyn Lopez Wright, Assistant Director, Larry P.
Cote, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for
Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Min Bahadur Thapa, and dependent petitioners Shiv Kumari
Paija and Ramesh Thapa, natives and citizens of Nepal, petition for
review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board)
denying their motion to reopen immigration proceedings. We have
reviewed the record and the Board’s order and find that the Board
did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to reopen. See
INS v. Doherty, 502 U.S. 314, 323-24 (1992). Accordingly, we deny
the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See
In Re: Thapa, Nos. A95-886-496, 497, 498 (B.I.A. Nov. 3, 2005). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
- 2 -