UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-1836
KENNETH N. UGOCHUKWU,
Petitioner,
versus
ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General of the
United States,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals. (A72-384-084)
Submitted: June 9, 2006 Decided: June 22, 2006
Before WILKINSON and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Nana Babington, BABINGTON LAW OFFICE, PLLC, Falls Church, Virginia,
for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General,
Carol Federighi, Senior Litigation Counsel, Jill Ptacek, Office of
Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,
Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Kenneth N. Ugochukwu, a native and citizen of Nigeria,
petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals (Board) denying as untimely his motion to reopen
immigration proceedings. We have reviewed the record and the
Board’s order and find that the Board did not abuse its discretion
in denying the motion to reopen. See INS v. Doherty, 502 U.S. 314,
323-34 (1992); 8 C.F.R. § 1003.23(b)(4)(ii) (2006). Accordingly,
we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the
Board. See In Re: Ugochukwu, No. A72-384-084 (B.I.A. July 25,
2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
- 2 -