UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-6105
In Re: CHARLES EDWARD O’NEIL,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
(5:00-cr-00047-5)
Submitted: June 7, 2006 Decided: June 22, 2006
Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charles Edward O’Neil, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Charles Edward O’Neil petitions for writ of mandamus,
alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his Rule
35(b) motion and other pending motions to correct or reduce his
sentence. O’Neil seeks an order from this court directing the
district court to act. Our review of the docket sheet reveals that
the district court has recently denied these motions. Accordingly,
though we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the
mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
- 2 -