UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-6324
THEODORE THOMAS WAGNER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
WILLIAM R. CREWS; UNNAMED POLICE OFFICERS;
CYNTHIA MCCANTS, Special Agent; MICHAEL
ANDERSON, Detective; MAGWOOD, Detective;
WILLIAM SHEPARDS, Detective; PAUL TITLE,
Detective; MICHAEL RINGLEY, Detective; PAUL
MCMONIGAL, Detective; HOWARD, Detective;
TURNER, Detective; MELERINE, Detective; LARRY
RICE, Detective,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District
Judge. (3:05-cv-01100-GRA)
Submitted: July 14, 2006 Decided: July 21, 2006
Before WILKINSON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Theodore Thomas Wagner, Appellant Pro Se. Hugh Willcox Buyck,
Darren K. Sanders, BUYCK LAW FIRM, Charleston, South Carolina, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Theodore Thomas Wagner seeks to appeal the district
court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to
deny Appellees’ motion to dismiss or for summary judgment and
granting the parties additional time to file dispositive motions.
This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28
U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral
orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v.
Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order
Wagner seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable
interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the
appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
- 3 -