Memah v. Gonzales

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-2259 JOIKE MEMAH, Petitioner, versus ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A97-194-354) Submitted: August 23, 2006 Decided: September 12, 2006 Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Petition granted and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion. Joike Memah, Petitioner Pro Se. Michele Yvette Francis Sarko, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Joike Memah, a native and citizen of Indonesia, has petitioned for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) adopting and affirming the Immigration Judge’s (IJ) denial of asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). Memah specifically states that he does not challenge the denial of asylum and CAT relief. Rather, he contests only the denial of withholding of removal, asserting, inter alia, that the IJ and Board failed to address his claim that he suffered past persecution. See 8 C.F.R. § 1208.16(b) (2006). As our review discloses that this claim has not in fact been addressed below, we grant the petition for review and remand this matter to the Board for a determination of Memah’s past persecution claim in the context of his claim for withholding of removal. See Gonzales v. Thomas, 126 S. Ct. 1613, 1615 (2006); INS v. Ventura, 537 U.S. 12, 16 (2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION GRANTED AND REMANDED - 2 -