UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-6922
ANTONIO D. TISDALE,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; HENRY MCMASTER,
Attorney General for South Carolina,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence. Patrick Michael Duffy, District
Judge. (4:04-cv-01319-PMD)
Submitted: September 28, 2006 Decided: October 10, 2006
Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Antonio D. Tisdale, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Derrick
K. McFarland, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA,
Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Antonio D. Tisdale seeks to appeal the district court’s
order accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to grant
Defendants summary judgment as to five of Tisdale’s seven grounds
for habeas relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) and deny Defendants
summary judgment on the remaining two grounds with leave to refile.
This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28
U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral
orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v.
Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order
Tisdale seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable
interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we deny a
certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal for lack of
jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
- 2 -
Tisdale v. State of SC
Combined Opinion