UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-1862
ABDUL S. AHMADY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
BRINCEFIELD, HARTNETT, TOMPKINS, AND CLARK,
P.C.,
Defendant - Appellee,
versus
AMINA AHMADY,
Plaintiff.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior
District Judge. (1:06-cv-00119-CMH)
Submitted: November 21, 2006 Decided: November 28, 2006
Before TRAXLER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Abdul S. Ahmady, Appellant Pro Se. Michael William Tompkins,
Brincefield, Hartnett & Associates, Alexandria, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Abdul S. Ahmady appeals the district court’s orders
dismissing Ahmady’s complaint and denying Ahmady’s “Retrying Motion
Court Order Misunderstanding,” which the district court construed
as as Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion. The district court found it
lacked subject matter jurisdiction in this civil action. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Ahmady v.
Brincefield, No. 1:06-cv-00119-CMH (E.D. Va. May 19, 2006 and
June 19, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 3 -