UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-7716
YA JELANI SIMBA, a/k/a Joseph H. Shaw,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
WENDY BRITT, Unit Manager; ISAAC BALDWIN,
Assistant Unit Manager; FLOYD E. SLATE,
Sergeant, Prison Guard; LINDA GLOVER,
Sergeant, Prison Guard; HENRY JOHNSON,
Sergeant, Prison Guard; THOMAS MEEKINS, Prison
Guard; SPURGEON WILBURN, Prison Guard; P. A.
GALLOWAY, Prison Guard; DON G. WOOD, Prison
Superintendent Scotland Correctional
Institution; FREDERICK HUBBARD, Assistant
Superintendent of Operations; GARY
CRUTCHFIELD, Assistant Superintendent of
Programs; MS. JORDAN, Nurse; M. BELLAMY,
Prison Guard; V. HALL, Lead Nurse; MARY DIANNE
WYATT, Unit Manager; DARLENE CAPEL, Prison
Guard; DEBRA MCLEOD-DUNCAN, Nursing
Supervisor; P. BERGMANN, Prison Guard; ANN
BETHEA, Prison Guard; T. TYNER, Prison Guard;
ELLIOTT ALFORD, Prison Guard; MS. HUNT, Prison
Guard; JAMES CAULDER, Prison Guard; A.
WILLIAMSON, Prison Guard; TAWANNA LOCKLEAR,
Prison Guard; G. HUNT, Prison Guard; A.
SPEIGHT, Prison Guard; SUSAN MORRISON, Prison
Guard; B. SMITH, Prison Guard, R. DIXON,
Prison Guard; MS. HUDSON, Prison Guard; MS.
DUNSTON, Prison Guard; A. MCLEAN, Sergeant,
Prison Guard; CONSTANCE LOCKLEAR, Prison
Guard; JANICE FARMER, Prison Guard; MATTHEW
PENNELL, Unit Manager; S. MICKEY BUNTON,
Assistant Unit Manager; KEITH WHITENER,
Assistant Superintendent; CURTIS BROWN, Prison
Guard Captain,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Durham. Wallace W. Dixon,
Magistrate Judge. (1:06-ct-00310-UA)
Submitted: December 21, 2006 Decided: January 5, 2007
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ya Jelani Simba, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Ya Jelani Simba seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s
dismissal of his § 1983 complaint without prejudice and the denial
of his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion. This court may exercise
jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and
certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292
(2000); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan
Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order Simba seeks to appeal is not
an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. See Domino Sugar
Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th
Cir. 1993). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of
jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
- 3 -