UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-7331
PETER O. ODIGHIZUWA,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
TRACEY S. RAY, Warden; LIEUTENANT MULLINS, in
his official and individual capacity;
LIEUTENANT YOUNEE, in his official and
individual capacity; LIEUTENANT ROSE, in his
official and individual capacity; SERGEANT
DAY, in his official and individual capacity;
CAPTAIN TAYLOR, in his official and individual
capacity; DOCTOR WILLIAMS, in his individual
capacity and official capacity; LIEUTENANT
YOUNCE,
Defendants - Appellees.
No. 06-7850
PETER O. ODIGHIZUWA,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
TRACEY S. RAY, Warden; LIEUTENANT MULLINS, in
his official and individual capacity;
LIEUTENANT YOUNEE, in his official and
individual capacity; LIEUTENANT ROSE, in his
official and individual capacity; SERGEANT
DAY, in his official and individual capacity;
CAPTAIN TAYLOR, in his official and individual
capacity; LIEUTENANT YOUNCE,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
DOCTOR WILLIAMS, in his individual capacity
and official capacity,
Defendant.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, District Judge.
(7:06-cv-00185-gec)
Submitted: February 15, 2007 Decided: February 22, 2007
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Peter O. Odighizuwa, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
In these consolidated appeals, Peter O. Odighizuwa
appeals the district court’s orders denying a preliminary
injunction and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000)
complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Odighizuwa v. Ray, No. 7:06-cv-00185-gec (W.D. Va.
July 13, 2006; Oct. 24, 2006). We deny Odighizuwa’s motions for
appointment of counsel and for an injunction. We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 3 -