UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-1793
ALICE M. DEANE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
MARSHALLS, INCORPORATED,
Defendant - Appellee.
No. 06-2039
ALICE M. DEANE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
MARSHALLS, INCORPORATED,
Defendant - Appellee.
No. 06-2174
ALICE M. DEANE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
MARSHALLS, INCORPORATED,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District
Judge. (7:06-mc-00031-jct)
Submitted: January 31, 2007 Decided: February 20, 2007
Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Alice M. Deane, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
In these consolidated appeals, Alice M. Deane appeals the
district court’s order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis
and dismissing her civil action* and the order denying her motion
filed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b). With regard to Deane’s appeal
of the order denying her Rule 60(b) motion, we find that Deane has
waived appellate review of that order by failing to challenge the
district court’s reasoning in her informal appellate brief.
Turning to the district court’s order dismissing Deane’s civil
action, we have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we grant Deane leave to proceed in forma pauperis and
affirm the order dismissing her civil action but modify the
dismissal to be without prejudice. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
*
We have jurisdiction to review this order because the
district court properly granted an extension of time to appeal.
- 3 -