UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-2161
RAJ BHARADWAJA,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
MARTIN O’MALLEY, Individually and as The Mayor
of Baltimore City; CITY OF BALTIMORE;
BALTIMORE CITY HOUSING AUTHORITY; DEPARTMENT
OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT; DORREYA
ELMENSHAWY, I n d i v i d ually and as
officer/employee of Baltimore City Department;
JOHN DOE, 1-5; JANE DOE, 1-5,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge.
(1:04-cv-03826-RDB)
Submitted: May 2, 2007 Decided: June 1, 2007
Before TRAXLER, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael P. Coyle, THE LAW OFFICES OF MICHAEL P. COYLE, Columbia,
Maryland, for Appellant. Karen Stakem Hornig, Chief Legal Counsel,
George A. Nilson, City Solicitor, William R. Phelan, Jr., Principal
Counsel, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Raj Bharadwaja brought this action against Martin
O’Malley, individually and as the Mayor of Baltimore City, the City
of Baltimore, and several other governmental and individual
defendants, alleging claims of wrongful discharge, defamation,
civil conspiracy and a claim of retaliation in violation of Title
VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e
to 2000e-17 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. See Bharadwaja v. O’Malley, No. 1:04-cv-03826-
RDB (D. Md. filed Sept. 27, 2006; entered Sept. 28, 2006). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -