UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-1636
GRAYSON & KUBLI, P.C.,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
JEFFREY P. GOLDSTEIN,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, Magistrate
Judge. (1:04-cv-01337-LO)
Submitted: April 20, 2007 Decided: June 11, 2007
Before WILLIAMS, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Rand L. Gelber, Vienna, Virginia, for Appellant. Mary E. Harkins,
GRAYSON & KUBLI, P.C., McLean, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant Jeffrey P. Goldstein appeals the district
court’s judgment that he owed legal fees under a finding of breach
of contract, or, in the alternative, quantum meruit. After a bench
trial, this court reviews the district court's conclusions of law
de novo and its findings of fact for clear error. Minyard Enter.,
Inc. v. Southeastern Chem. & Solvent Co., 184 F.3d 373, 380 (4th
Cir. 1999); Fed. R. Civ. P. 52(a). A finding of fact is clearly
erroneous when, “although there is evidence to support it, the
reviewing court on the entire evidence is left with the definite
and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.” United
States v. United States Gypsum Co., 333 U.S. 364, 395 (1948); In re
Green, 934 F.2d 568, 570 (4th Cir. 1991).
We have reviewed the parties' briefs and the joint
appendix and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. See Grayson & Kubli v.
Goldstein, No. 1:04-cv-01337-LO (E.D. Va. Apr. 20, 2006). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -